On Twitter (where you can follow my Twitterstream), there is a Twittersplurge analysis of the Priory by the Education Editor of The Times, Greg Hurst:
Risks exposed by Priory Academy scandal: 1. Academy chain
HQs handle much larger sums of money than a maintained school ...
2. Entrepreneurial activity by academies/chains widen scope
for abuse eg buying grade II Georgian manor house / activity centre in France
..
3. Many academy chains built / led by dominant charismatic
figure who other staff / governors may find harder to challenge
4. Academy chains with business links / sponsors have
greater scope for conflicts of interest with suppliers, a risk that grows with
scale
5. Many academy chains generate commercial / private revenue
steams from leaders ' speaking, training, conferences, consulting
6. Business people who join chains in corporate / governance
roles may not be as used to dealing with public rather than private money
Something for boards and managers to think about (especially audit committees - where academies have them).
No comments:
Post a Comment